Agency Hype vs Facts

[OkieMan]

... in response to Re:  Agency Hype vs Facts , posted by utopiacowboy on Feb 12, 2005

Utopiacowboy,
I was not talking about that.  I am sure your wife is a wonderful lady. But, I am talking about the excessive stuff - near nude, sexual posing in the photos put on a website that total strangers will see, and all the while saying that you want a good man for a husband, etc.  Naturally, I am "attracted".  But, neither do I believe her, if she goes to that extreme to grab your attention.  But, that's just me.

                             OkieMan

P.S.  Bill, if I am fortunate  to someday marry a lady who is the quality of your wife, then I will truly be a lucky man!

[utopiacowboy]

... in response to Re: Re:  Agency Hype vs Facts , posted by OkieMan on Feb 12, 2005

I still would not be too quick to judge them, Okieman, without knowing them a little first. Let's face it. With all the girls out there, they have to do something to get your attention. The question is, what do they do with it once they have it?

[OkieMan]

... in response to Re: Re: Re:  Agency Hype vs Facts , posted by utopiacowboy on Feb 12, 2005

Utopiacowboy,
 Let me add to that by saying that I am glad it's the girls pictures on the website, and not ours.  The girls are much more fun to look at.  But, I was also referring to the info they put in their profiles.  Sometimes, it looks just like 50 other girls lines; sort of like the agency just put in what they thought we wanted to hear.  Well, enough said.

                           OkieMan

[jediknight]

... in response to Re: Re: Re: Re:  Agency Hype vs Facts , posted by OkieMan on Feb 12, 2005

i know what you mean, when i was going through profiles i was reading the same description on every page, with just some subtle differences, it wasn't until i read my girlfriends description that i took a second look at her profile, it was completely unlike the rest. it was also in spanish so i think that allowed her to express herself fully. some people are just better at writing than others, more creative but i think that the agencies should encourage their members to write in spanish or to devote more time in translating their spanish profile to english and not just put the standard listing.

[OkieMan]

... in response to Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:  Agency Hype vs Fact..., posted by jediknight on Feb 12, 2005

On the nose.  That is one of the points I was trying to make.  I mean if you believe all that tripe that is put into the profiles, every girl wants Prince Charming, and it all becomes a "cookie cutter" world.  Since we know that is not true, I guess that I was allowing my frustration to show through.  But, all in all, I really appreciated everyone's comments.

                              OkieMan

[Onephd]

... in response to Re:  Agency Hype vs Facts , posted by utopiacowboy on Feb 12, 2005

Many Brazilianas consider the skin to be apart of their formal dress so thats why they often sun bathe and often wear clothes that show their skin.  

Colombians on the other hand like to wear clothes that are flattering to their figure.  

Also it has to do with the climate.  You don't see many bear mid sections in Bogota. The weather is too cold.  

So you can't judge without knowing a few things first.

Take care

[OkieMan]

... in response to Re: Re:  Agency Hype vs Facts , posted by Onephd on Feb 12, 2005

I can see that the responses so far are limited to my comments about how the women dress (or undress) in their photos put on some websites.  My bigger picture questions dealt with issues that involved, or possibly involved with misinformation, manipulation, scams and lies perpetrated by either the agencies, the women involved or both.  Not just how they dressed.  That is only a very small part of it.  Frankly, I am just like most men.  When you see a beautiful, sexy woman; I enjoy it -- unless she is trying to con me. That's all.  If she is genuinely attracted to me, then that is something else.  I just don't like the phoney.  Naturally, I realize that nobody likes the phony. Again, I realize that this topic has already been discussed many times.  I was just looking for some trends or tendencies.  Plus, I wrote this late last night, because the board was dead, and I was bored.  But, I have asked myself these questions, so I was not pulling your leg either.
                             OkieMan

[WS244]

... in response to Re: Re: Re:  Agency Hype vs Facts , posted by OkieMan on Feb 12, 2005

20 year old women are only attracted to 50 year old men if there is money, or a one way ticket involved. If one doubts this, then a 50 year old  needs to live down there in the same means and lifestyle of a "young 20 year old have not lady" in question, and then see what happens to the "attraction".  
This is "business for services rendered" and love is a four letter word with as many meanings as people.  Some of the men on this board living down there have a lifestyle that equates to an endless supply of young women, and are intelligent enough to know why.

ws

[OkieMan]

... in response to Re: Re: Re: Re:  Agency Hype vs Facts , posted by WS244 on Feb 12, 2005

Very well said.  However, I guess that I am somewhat of a rarity; in that, I am not trying to chase 20 year old girls.  Lord knows that it must be fun to have casual sex with this "endless supply" that you referred to.  But, in the end, I don't want to wake up at 60, and be a lonely old man.  So, I am making the attempt to have a relationship with a very attractive 35 year old lady in Cali.  If that works out, great.  If it does not, then I will try again; but still, I will be looking for a lady who is young and beautiful, just not still in the "cradle", so to speak.  To each his own I guess.

                              OkieMan