I prefer to keep forum squabbles contained to the forum they originate on, but since there seems to be accusations flying against Spencer, I'll make an acception and allow at least some dialogue as long as things don't get out of hand.

There is no "protection" of any agency on the RWG. And those posters who frequent the board know this.

I myself have started and continued criticisms of these so called protected agencies, such as LTP.

Any assertion to the contrary is clearly not true. And it is sad that you Jack are promoting this. You and I have always had a decent relationship in the past, and I have had no problem recommending your agency to RWG posters.

I now wonder whether I should reconsider that recommendation, considering that in bashing RWG and the moderators of RWG, you are bashing me. And I dont appreciate it.

Squirecam

You wrote: "...despicable personal attacks against women
 are watched mutely by the masses..."

I think this must be about the thing between you and LP about whether he met your wife or not. I see you still feel bad about this regarding people who didn't get involved. Maybe I am speaking for some of us when I say that (1) we didn't like reading any of this, (2) it seemed like you two could have written about this privately if you had wanted to, and (3) that how can we take sides when we had no involvement? How do I know if he met your wife? I wish it could have been handled privately and/or not brought up by LP in the first place.

I hope things are going great for you and your wife.

I missed the swear word. That kind of language clearly should never have been used. I hope he apologized for that.

My sitcheeashun is that our 129f has been approved and we are waiting for Warsaw to handle her of-169 and schedule a medical exam, then an interview. I hope it won't take more than three months because she'd like to study at the local college, and they start up around August 20th. Thank you for your kind wishes!

************************************************************

Jack and MarkInTx warning
Post a follow-up Return to Forum FAQ Edit Message
Posted by Patrick on 01/17/2003

The next one of you to reply to the other, or mention the other in any post will be banned for a week.

************************************************************

Patrick I am sure I am speaking for many, certainly for myself, when I ask you to please keep this warning and condition in effect. As you can probably tell a majority of his contributions are negative in nature to the board and many of it's particapants.

I am sure you have noticed how peaceful and polite the board has become Patrick when a certain instigator does not give us his daily dose of wisdom that changes weekly.

Talk about newby's being confused, not wanting to post! I am sure many newby's do not know what to think when they see an individual who is Planet Love's second all time leading poster one day advise the board, and I quote " Believe in true love -- be careful of who you marry -- love her like it's never going to end AND GET A PRENUP SIGNED!!!!". He strongly advises everyone to get a pre-nuptial, except when it comes to him! Or how one week this individual advises that a person must write many, visit many to be successful and then after writing one, visiting one and marrying one, now this is without doubt the most successful way of doing things. How he threatens that once after his bride get's to America he will never post anymore in hopes people will beg him to stay (and no one does) and than does quite the opposite by posting even more, which wouldn't be so bad except for the constant flip-flop of advice and opinions and mis-stating of facts and statistics which do not exist in his hopes of proving his method the best way. How he advises newby's that, and I quote " I know there has been much discussion on whether you should expect sex when going to visit your FSU girlfriend. I would say that A) a true gentleman never expects sex – no matter what continent he is on" and then loads up on viagra himself, wonder why!!!! And as far as how long a guy should wait until getting married during the 90 day K-1 period, and again I quote on 12-05-01 " In other words... use the three months to really decide if you BOTH will be happy here, together" and on 11-23-01 "Three months isn't very long, as you said Tootsie. And yet, many people don't even bother using the three months they are given." And then marries with-in the first 10 days himself!!! Come on, when can anyone take this guys advice when he does not even practice what he preaches? Can you say 'clueless'?

It seems almost all the advice he gives turns out just the opposite for him. Don't have sex, get to know the woman before marriage, write many ladies-visit many, only meet nice women, etc

One of the few things boy blunder has ever said that makes any sense was on 10-18-02 when he said the following " I mention these because it has made me face one fact I would rather ignore: The Internet is a good source for information... but it is an equally good source for mis-information." Yes, I think we can all agree with that. And look at the source of the greatest mis-information.

I moderate the scams section. That's right. Me.

I get a copy of each and every post to those 2 sections. If Jack had posted a scam to either of those sections, I'd know about it. And it would not have been deleted by me either. Or, I would have asked Spencer why the posts were deleted. So either he never posted them, or they were not posted in the scams section, because they certainly were not deleted under my watch.

Squirecam