Mark H and Jack warning

[BarryM]

... in response to agreed Ken!, posted by Jack on Oct 9, 2002

don't go overboard with it. It's really not worth the time and It'll just cause more fussin and fightin. You shouldn't spend another minute on it.

-blm

[MarkInTx]

... in response to Spam vs. semi-spam, posted by KenC on Oct 9, 2002

Yes... that is exactly what I was saying...

[Oscar]

... in response to Excuse ME! Reasonable advice is the poin..., posted by Jack on Oct 9, 2002

I personally have liked Mark, but he really has been misquoting and distorting what people say here of late and worse, when you draw his attention to it, never does he apologize, which I think is somewhat amazing.  I can only guess he feels that to apologize, he is giving in to the "childish" element on the board, as he calls it...  He seems to want to legislate the moral character on the board yet it does not always seem to apply to him.  I think manipulating the truth is just as offensive as someone calling someone else a "dorf"..  

[Mark H]

... in response to Mark H and Jack warning, posted by Patrick on Oct 7, 2002

Agreed, however it seems we already have a violation of your demands.

Mark H.

[Jack]

... in response to Mark H and Jack warning, posted by Patrick on Oct 7, 2002

Patrick, I will not respond to him and generally do not. I only responded to him today after he sabatoged a post of mine. I do apoligize to you and the other board members for the outburst.

[Patrick]

... in response to Re: Mark H and Jack warning, posted by Jack on Oct 7, 2002

If you wish to re-post your message, do so without any reference to "one man" wanting his girlfriend to make money from renting a flat.

[Jack]

... in response to Re: Re: Mark H and Jack warning, posted by Patrick on Oct 7, 2002

The sentence has been removed, thanks!