Well,

I figured this would happen.   If you are a celebrity in Hollyweird, even if you are a slimy pervert; you can get off!
However, having said that, the prosecution also had some gooky witnesses; so I don't know who is weirder, Michael, or that boy's mother?  It seems that this is a different version of the O.J. trial-- without Johnny Cochran or Judge Ito.  If you posters from California have any more insight, please feel free to give us your opinion.  All I can say is, in Oklahoma, we convict child molesters!

                                  OkieMan

... in response to Re: Michael Jackson Acquitted!, posted by Ricardo on Jun 13, 2005

I am not a lawyer, and obviously I was not able to read the court documents.  So, in a court of law, at least in California, my opinions do not count.  However, the old saying goes," if it quacks like a duck", etc.  I would never want to be unjust to anyone; but that guy seems to have all of the attitudes and actions of a child molester!  If I am wrong, then so be it.  He is off scott free anyhow.  O.J. got off too, but that didn't mean he was truly innocent. Naturally, everyone is entitled to their opinion.  I've said mine.

                               OkieMan