Title: Heat gives a gift to PL Post by: Heat on December 25, 2005, 05:00:00 AM Merry Christmas and Happy New Year and may all your dreams come true.
They have for 27 million Iraqs........... http://michaelyon-online.com/media/video/15Dec05Election.wmv Title: Re: Heat gives a gift to PL Post by: mudd on December 25, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Heat gives a gift to PL, posted by Heat on Dec 25, 2005
Very nice video. Even though everybody thinks going there under the pretense of mass destruction weapons was a farce, at least they have the right and ability to vote now for more than one candidate. Title: Re: Re: Heat gives a gift to PL Post by: Heat on December 26, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: Heat gives a gift to PL, posted by mudd on Dec 25, 2005
Even though everybody thinks going there under the pretense of mass destruction weapons was a farce[[ Would you include President Clinton and John Skerry who also stated the same thing in your assessment? Title: Re: Re: Re: Heat gives a gift to PL Post by: mudd on December 26, 2005, 05:00:00 AM Title: But are US troops being poisioned ? Some say YES! Post by: BenKramer1 on December 26, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: Heat gives a gift to PL, posted by mudd on Dec 25, 2005
http://www.rense.com/general69/eng.htm
By Karl W B Schwarz Title: Who ya gonna believe?A question of judgement. Post by: Pete E on December 27, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to But are US troops being poisioned ? Some..., posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 26, 2005
Guess we are hurting for chica stories. There is a bigger question here than any particular incident.Its how do we know about anything we do not have direct personal experience with,how do we get our imformation about the world and who do we choose to belive? I remember one time when I was still an atheist[ I now consider myself spiritual but believe little of things ancient and my god is not a man in the sky with a long white beard ]I was in ac discussion with a traditionally religious friend,we were talking specifically about a man in the sky type god.I said I have seen no evidence,nor have you.He said do you believe there is a New York? I said yes.He said have you ever been there? I said no.He said then why do you belive it?I said because it is consistent with everything I have read seen or heard about. So its about judgement about evidence from others that we can choose to belive or not belive.And logic.For instance what kind of a cover up or conspiracy would be required for 9/11 to sell us the story of the world trade center buidings being hit by other than the commercial airliners we are told it was?In my mind an unbelieveable conspiracy would be required.Its just not BELIVABLE,not even close,not a million to one.Just the question of what happened to the real airliners makes it a million to one. Its not a question of intelligence,I know very intelligent people who believe this.One bought a cabin in the woods for Y2K.Its a question of judgement,and even looking within for a reasson why someone would want to belive something so incredible. Its seems to me a big element is total distrust of any traditional sources,then the ability to belive very non traditional sources.My friend who got into this is a tax rebel,I thinks thats how he bumped in to internet sites that then went way off in to other things.And about intelligence,I think the intelligence to dream up or put together details on some of these off the wall theories is very high. I personally have faith in the army of news reporters and investigative journalists who would like nothing more than to find something very unique to report about to smoke out the the evidence and truth in anything that might come up. Its seems to me the 9/11 conspiracy has no credability at all.Nor does another theory that we are being bombarded by electrons from space.2 people including my very intelligent friend buy that one.His answer is you have to examine the evidence.Evidence from who is my first answer,then maybe you look at what they are saying having first looked at the first part of the question.Another factor is does it have enough credibility to even be talked about in the mainstream press or by journalists with credibility? Some people answer to this approch is another vast conspiracy with people being controlled or affraid to even talk about it.Not in the present world in the US is my answer to that one. So who is saying what,who is even bothering to dispute,if there is not even a SERIOUS dispute that tells me alot,and logically how likely is it to be true? Now I could talk about thinks like the JFK assasination that does have serious dispute,although even here I think most reporters with good judgement will tell you the chance of more than one shooter is extremly remote,but at least there is lots of serious disagreement about that,and it is a subject not nearly as vulnerable to logic as the 9/1 conspiracy would be. The issue of chemical issues with our troops in the middle east and enviremental damage in general has alot of serious dispute,but people seem to line up behing their political beliefs.No surprise a person who belives this thinks we are doing huge irreparable damage to mother earth.Lining up with pre concieved notions. So is there a Bagdad?I say yes,millions to one.Consistent with ALL evidence.Were the Trade center buildings hit by other than commercial aircraft.No.Millions to one.Inconsistent with credible evidense and TOTALLY inconsistent with logic.Was there chemical damage to some troops?I think yes,some,thousands to one to one,but its probably VERY much more limited than many would belive.Was Oswald the lone assasian?I say yes,100 to one,lots of you might think I am crazy on that one.As you can see I'm not big at all on conspiracy theories. One of my friends,a woman,and I got in to a discussion of the assination.She was getting her evidence from the movie on the subject.I said you are taking your evidence from a story that is fictionalised,parts just totally made up. There may be more fiction running around on the internet than that. Judegement is the question,based on current CREDIBIBLE evidence.My religious friend belives in Noah and the Ark.I do not,but I told him if they find that ark it will be a WHOLE differet story.Untill then I do not belive every species of life got on one boat,or that the world was totally flooded less than 6000 years ago,but then we get in to religion,which has a bigger effect on personal belief and judgement than anything I can think of.You are even told suspend your judgement. Anybody got a chica story? Pete Title: Are we expected to read all that? Post by: Bob S on December 26, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to But are US troops being poisioned ? Some..., posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 26, 2005
"http://www.blahblahblah.com/general69/eng.htm United States Is Actively By Karl 'America Sux' Schwarz ZZZzzzz.... (- -) Title: Re: Are we expected to read all that? Post by: BenKramer1 on December 26, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Are we expected to read all that?, posted by Bob S on Dec 26, 2005
Hi Bob, You are right I should have only posted the most imortant part of the article along with the URL for thois that want to read more. Here it is: The United States used DU weapons (depleted uranium) in Afghanistan when there were little or no armored vehicles to dispose of in that invasion. The Taliban had no significant armored forces. DU weapons were created as anti-armor weapons. They have found DU in the soil samples in Afghanistan, in the drinking water and in human bodies. They have also found non-depleted uranium, very lethal and toxic and is strictly man-made. It is known to produce grotesque birth defects and that can occur when either the man or the woman have been exposed to DU or non-depleted uranium. However, they found something else. Title: The farm hand speaks out............... Post by: Heat on December 26, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: Are we expected to read all that?, posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 26, 2005
Dude stick to milking the cows..You failed in Cali and that is all the teat you will ever see. Title: If only you knew what you are talking bout.... Post by: BenKramer1 on December 27, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to The farm hand speaks out..............., posted by Heat on Dec 26, 2005
Elizabeth is a beautiful slender Calena that lives in San Antonio is waiting for me return to Cali, but she knows that I have to finish the first stage of the legal case I have been working on all year. She met Pete and his two roommates that were livng there at the time. We have been in email and phone contact since we met. Its time or you to get a brain and realize you dont know what you are talking about. Get a life and dont worry about mine ! Ben Title: I guess that makes two of you then Post by: Fuzzyone on December 28, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to If only you knew what you are talking bo..., posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 27, 2005
I think I would believe heat alot more then you any day of the week. At least he don't post bull that nobody but a moron would believe. I think it is funny that you choose to post that wad of crap after heat put a very good post up about Iraq. I for one think it is time you sue someone to get a brain who knows maybe this Title: Re: If only you knew what you are talking bout.... Post by: Heat on December 27, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to If only you knew what you are talking bo..., posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 27, 2005
Sure dude..you will believe anything. You only make 25 thousand a year how can you afford her?
Title: Try agian moron !!! Post by: BenKramer1 on December 27, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: If only you knew what you are talkin..., posted by Heat on Dec 27, 2005
Now you admit I did NOT fail in Cali so now you know you are worried about how much I make ??? When I return to Cali money wont be a problem, its not now. My time away from work is the problem now. You or Pete know nothing about what I am making now so shove your nonsense. Ben Title: Re: Try agian moron !!! Post by: Pete E on December 28, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Try agian moron !!!, posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 27, 2005
I said nothing about it.It wasn't me. Pete Title: Re: If only you knew what you are talking bout.... Post by: Fuzzyone on December 27, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to If only you knew what you are talking bo..., posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 27, 2005
I wonder what she does while she is waiting for you. I would not worry I bet she will wait forever if she has too. I would be carful with the info you are posting the white house might beem death rays at you to punish you. Is there not a web site where you can post all this bullsh@t you want? Before Title: The Sheat head keeps blowing ..... Post by: BenKramer1 on December 26, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to The farm hand speaks out..............., posted by Heat on Dec 26, 2005
Did you really work for the DEA or are just a blowhard ? Did you ever wonder why drug use and the flow of drugs has expanded sine we declared the "War on Drugs" back in the 80s ? Its all BS !!! Title: Up your medication and pull down the foil hat! Post by: Heat on December 26, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to But are US troops being poisioned ? Some..., posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 26, 2005
Because you are a farm hand with a mental problem. Title: Hey sHeat Head ! They dont lie at Congressional Hearings!!! Post by: BenKramer1 on December 26, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Up your medication and pull down the foi..., posted by Heat on Dec 26, 2005
http://www.iacenter.org/depleted/poisondust_hoskins.htm Film Poison DUst features vets exposed to DU By David Hoskins February 20, 2005--The premiere showing on Feb. 15 of "Poison DUst"--a documentary highlighting the effects of Depleted Uranium [DU] on veterans returning from the Iraq war-- attracted a large and engaged crowd at the New School theater. Filmmaker Sue Harris was on hand to introduce the film and take questions afterward. Former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark and Sara Flounders, national co-director of the International Action Center, also spoke at the event. Title: Hey Ben! Post by: Ray on December 26, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Hey sHeat Head ! They dont lie at Congre..., posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 26, 2005
Do yourself a big favor and quit listening to all that stupid anti-American communist propaganda. You'll sleep much better at night... :-) Ramsey Clark IS NOT on our side! Ray Title: Re: Hey Ray! Post by: BenKramer1 on December 27, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Hey Ben!, posted by Ray on Dec 26, 2005
The truth is that many of our troops are coming home sick, and we are all entitled to free speak freely. Am I correct ? Ben Title: Yes Ben Post by: Ray on December 27, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: Hey Ray!, posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 27, 2005
You are certainly entitled to speak freely. Did someone tell you that you can’t speak? I think you are hallucinating again. Better listen to Heat and take your meds… :-) I served 20+ years in the U.S. armed forces to make sure that folks like you can say what you want in the USA. And I also came home sick from serving overseas. Sick of ass-hole America-hating commies like that sniveling Ramsey Clark and his ilk who never pass up an opportunity to bash America. If you want to quote traitors like that, you are certainly free to do so, as I am also free to tell you to stuff that communist shit up your ass. There, how’s that for free speech Bennie? ROFLMAO! Now have a Happy New Year, Ray Title: I agree Post by: Joeylikey on December 27, 2005, 05:00:00 AM Title: Great minds think alike ? NOT! Post by: BenKramer1 on December 27, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Yes Ben, posted by Ray on Dec 27, 2005
[This message has been edited by BenKramer1] Hey Ray, Are you going to deny that many of our vets came back home from Vietnam poisioned from agent Orange, came home from GulfWar I with the Gulf War Illness, and are still coming home to this day sick from the weapons they have been exposed to ? If you deny that then you need shove your narrown minded thinking up you @sshole !!! At times the US Govt has denied using DU weapons and at time they have defended the use of DU weapons. Does that sound like Clinton or Bush ? Sounds like both of them if you ask me, I think both of them are huge liars. http://www.thepowerhour.com/du.htm Read some of these links that have nothing to do with Ramsey Clark that tell about depleted uranium that many of our troops are exposed to and have died from after they came back home. I am sure you dont think the US Govt. would lie about the MIAs from past wars either right ? Ben Title: Cheap Communist Propaganda Post by: Ray on December 27, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Great minds think alike ? NOT!, posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 27, 2005
Ben, I think you’re suffering from depleted intelligence… LOL! If you believe all that anti-American propaganda that you have been spouting, then you’re either dumber than a box of rocks or you’re one of them. Now take your commie conspiracy theories and your America-hating friends and flush them down the nearest toilet with the rest of the smelly shit you’ve been reading. You aren’t fooling anyone here with your garbage. Now why do really hate your country? Ray Title: You just can handle the truth can you Ray ? Post by: BenKramer1 on December 27, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Cheap Communist Propaganda, posted by Ray on Dec 27, 2005
When ever the Neocons come across something that they cant face up to they only have one answer. You must be a commie! Clinton said once "you cant hate your Govt. and love your country." Ray you are just as full sh!t as Bill Clinton. Ben Title: You wouldn't recognize the truth if it bit you in the ass Ben Post by: Ray on December 27, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to You just can handle the truth can you Ra..., posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 27, 2005
I have absolutely no problem facing up to commies and their propaganda. I spent most of my adult life training to kill communists and I can smell one a mile away. And you sure aren’t going to find the truth in that leftist garbage that you have been quoting here. You little whining leftist weenies just can’t handle any criticism, can you? You think you can spout your anti-American garbage and when someone responds in a way you don’t like, you snivel and whine and claim that people won’t let you speak your mind. Why don’t you go to Cuba or North Korea and try to put down the government in public. The commies will lock your ass up or shoot you, you little weenie. You still haven’t answered the question. Why do you really hate your country? Come on, spit it out. Ray :-) Title: I could write a book on why I depise the Govt. Post by: BenKramer1 on December 28, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to You wouldn't recognize the truth if it b..., posted by Ray on Dec 27, 2005
So anyone that says they dont believe in govt conspiracies, they just dont kow what they are talking about. I have been a victim of a govt conspiracies with the highest levels of govt in Ohio, the Governor included. Thats about all the details I will get into on this board and would not have gone this far had ray not insisted in it. I also have a close friend that wound up in prison twice because he blew the whistle on some govt operations, one was a kiddy porn ring, one was a drug ring. You understand some things now Ray ??? Ben Title: Yes, you sound like a victim Post by: Ray on December 29, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to I could write a book on why I depise the..., posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 28, 2005
[This message has been edited by Ray] O.K. Ben, so you had some problems with the legal system in your state and you’re pissed. Big deal! I have no problem with those who dislike, distrust, or despise the government or who are opposed to the war. You certainly have the right to feel the way you do for whatever reasons you may have. BUT, you have posted some stuff on this forum, for the world to see, that mocks the United States of America, it’s military, and it’s leaders in time of war, while brave Americans are dying and putting their lives on the line for their country. Since you posted it without comment, I must assume that you agree with it. The Americans that undermine their country in a time of war and give aid and comfort to it’s enemies are nothing but traitors in my book. You can claim your right to free speech all you want, but you are still betraying your country. Yes, hating your country is your right, but in time of war, when your fellow Americans are dying, you have no right to side with our enemies and still call yourself an American. I consider Ramsey Clark and others that you are so quick to quote as traitors to their country. I have more respect for dog crap than ass-holes like Ramsey Clark. To imply that the war on terror is a farce and 9-11 was a government conspiracy is just plain garbage. When you post that trash here, you are no better than the traitors who wrote it. If you don’t agree with everything that you posted, you didn’t say so, so I’ll assume that you also feel as they do about their country and I’ll give you the same respect that I give them, zero! Hate your country if you wish, but don’t expect other Americans to sit by and watch you aid our enemies on this forum without some harsh comments in reply. Ray Title: Sounds like you are p!ssed now ! Post by: BenKramer1 on December 29, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Yes, you sound like a victim, posted by Ray on Dec 29, 2005
But I have no doubts at all that time will prove that I am right in what I say. You will realize that you have had the wool pulled over your eyes. Ben Title: Not pissed, just disgusted... Post by: Ray on December 29, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Sounds like you are p!ssed now !, posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 29, 2005
...with the whining hate-America crowd. I'm sure that time will only prove that your crowd is a bunch of whackos and as Heat would say, you have had the tin foil pulled over your eyes :-) Ray Title: ?????? Post by: Joeylikey on December 28, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to I could write a book on why I depise the..., posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 28, 2005
Oh no, the Conspiracy Theory!! Title: Re: I could write a book on why I depise the Govt. Post by: Pete E on December 28, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to I could write a book on why I depise the..., posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 28, 2005
You were prosecuted based on a law that was not in effect at the time you did whatever they want to prosecute you for?Seems any lawyer could get you off on that one,its unbelievable.What makes me think we are not getting the whole story?I suspect there is LOTS MORE to it. But,one thing,if you choose to fight the IRS for instance,you can run out of money trying and they can proceed forever,which gives them an unfair advantage. I know a guy who lost a big row with them and everything he had and choose to live an underground lifestyle,in effect screwing himself to avoid dealing with them.He was wealthy once and probably could have created that wealth again by staying mainstream,but he has been underground for years living a marginal lifestyle.He sure showed them ,right?Cutting of his nose to spite his face?They could care less. There comes a time to just drop these it ain't right wars and get on with your life,or you can wind up screwing yourself trying to spite someone else or in an effort to be vindicated.Life can be unfair sometimes.Do you want to make your whole life about fighting a being right issue. Pete Title: Pete, Its all about getting due process in the Court Post by: BenKramer1 on December 28, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: I could write a book on why I depise..., posted by Pete E on Dec 28, 2005
Which there is so very little of these days in the US. From what I hear its not much different in other countries either. My friend who I am working with won a RICO suit in Federal Court, but the crooked judges are preventing him from collecting on it. How much more corrupt can you get than that ??? Ben Title: No Pete I was NOT fighting the IRS N/T Post by: BenKramer1 on December 28, 2005, 05:00:00 AM Title: Re: I could write a book on why I depise the Govt. Post by: doombug on December 28, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to I could write a book on why I depise the..., posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 28, 2005
A rock and a hard place. People expect (or believe) laws to be set in stone, yet there has to be an allowance for malleability as the country progresses (or degresses, hehe). Contrast Thomas Jefferson's take on ex post facto... "The sentiment that ex post facto laws are against natural right, is so strong in the United States, that few, if any, of the State constitutions have failed to proscribe them. The federal constitution indeed interdicts them in criminal cases only; but they are equally unjust in civil as in criminal cases, and the omission of a caution which would have been right, does not justify the doing what is wrong. Nor ought it to be presumed that the legislature meant to use a phrase in an unjustifiable sense, if by rules of construction it can be ever strained to what is just." ...with the decision fifteen years earlier in Calder v. Bull (1798). "Justice Paterson argued that the bar on the impairment of contracts suggested that the framers of the Constitution intended the prohibition on ex post facto laws to include 'crimes, pains, and penalties, and no further.' "According to Justice Iredell, the purpose of the ex post facto clause did not extend to 'civil cases, to cases that merely affect the private property of citizens.'" The decision makes sense on a certain level. One has to allow for the potential outlawing/restriction of unforseen practices that could one day get out of hand, infringe on others, or squeek through loopholes.
Peace out! Title: Re: I could write a book on why I depise the Govt. Post by: Keith NC on December 28, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to I could write a book on why I depise the..., posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 28, 2005
Just another leftwing lawyer. You guys are destroying this country. Title: Re: Re: I could write a book on why I depise the Govt. Post by: doombug on December 28, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: I could write a book on why I depise..., posted by Keith NC on Dec 28, 2005
LOL! You may be more right than you know (regarding lawyers). I'm reading a great book right now, "Big Fat Liars: How Politicians, Corporations, and the Media use Science and Statistics to Manipulate the Public," and there's a chapter titled "The Attack on Business" that addresses this problem. "As recently as 1972, there were 10,000 more doctors than lawyers (including judges) working in the U.S., according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Yet by 1999, the country had in excess of 200,000 more lawyers (not counting judges) than doctors. And this imbalance is growing." He estimates that there are now roughly 950,000 non-government lawyers in the U.S. "Trial Lawyers, Inc. [a report on the nation's biggest tort law firms]... is among the biggest businesses in the nation, even though it produces nothing and instead leeches off the production of others. The tort lawyer industry in the U.S., [the] report notes, has revenues half again as great as Microsoft Corp. and twice the income of Coca-Cola." The book quotes some findings from a 2003 report on Trial Lawyers, Inc. that was released by the Center for Legal Policy of the Manhattan Institute: "The classic conception of a plaintiff's lawyer is an advocate who waits until he is approached by a client with a grievance to be resolved--by negotiation, if possible, and by court action only as a last resort. But that conception is far from the current reality, at least for the big paintiffs' attorneys running Trial Trial Lawyers, Inc." "These leading plaintiffs' lawyers run complex, multi-million dollar organizations that use sophisticated and expensive marketing to pursue clients through every commercial avenue, including the Internet. Like any business expanding its market presence, Trial Lawyers, Inc., uses sales tactics such as no-cost, no-risk offers. As one lawsuit-industry-sponsored Web site declares, 'Seek justice NOW by submitting your class action information online to be considered for a FREE case evaluation!' These tactics are often designed to launch mass tort cases of the sort that have all but replaced the principle of fair and impartial justice with a new governing principle: winning through intimidation." Title: Re: Re: I could write a book on why I depise the Govt. Post by: BenKramer1 on December 28, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: I could write a book on why I depise..., posted by Keith NC on Dec 28, 2005
I am not a lawyer, but a self educated paralegal, and I am far from being a left winger. Wise up man ! Title: Something strange Post by: Joeylikey on December 28, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: Re: I could write a book on why I de..., posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 28, 2005
I work in the jail system and you sound a lot like an inmate. A wannabe jailhouse lawyer. Blaming the government for everything and anything. Never taking responsibility. HHMMMMMMMM Title: Something strange Post by: Joeylikey on December 28, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: Re: I could write a book on why I de..., posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 28, 2005
I work in the jail system and you sound a lot like an inmate. A wannabe jailhouse lawyer. Blaming the government for everything and anything. Never taking responsibility. HHMMMMMMMM Title: Re: Something strange Post by: BenKramer1 on December 29, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Something strange, posted by Joeylikey on Dec 28, 2005
Sure easy for you to say something stupid like that when you dont know what you are talking about. Its about due process, do you know what that is ? Dont keep talking like a total moron. Ben Title: Re: Re: Something strange Post by: Keith NC on December 29, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: Something strange, posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 29, 2005
What are you, like 10 years old? I will be amazed if any of the ladies in Latin America wants to be with someone like you. You sound like a sniveling little brat that doesn't get his way. Keith Title: Re: Re: Re: Something strange Post by: Joeylikey on January 03, 2006, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: Re: Something strange, posted by Keith NC on Dec 29, 2005
The secret is out Ben. You really need to find a forum, not this one, to spew your hatred. Like Keith said, I also will be amazed if you can get a Latin women. Title: I have a girl friend in Cali so........ Post by: BenKramer1 on December 30, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: Re: Something strange, posted by Keith NC on Dec 29, 2005
if you dont like my attitude you can shove it man ! What makes you I give a damn what you think ? LOL ! Ben Title: Just curious Post by: Joeylikey on December 29, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: Something strange, posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 29, 2005
So, when was your release date. You should really control your hatred. Yes, I do know what due process is all about. It looks like the only opionion you want to hear is your own. If we don't bow down to you we must be the enemy. In my job I work with a lot of wackos. 99.9% of them sound like the stuff that you are preaching. You should re-read your posts. Does that sound like the thoughts of a normal person? Title: Re: Just curious Post by: BenKramer1 on December 29, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Just curious, posted by Joeylikey on Dec 29, 2005
I have attorney friends that complain they dont get due process in the courts also,and that the legal system is corrupt so if your theory is correct they are wackos too, right ? Your ability to analyze the truth is sooo professional ! Keep talking stupid ! Ben Title: Re: Re: Re: I could write a book on why I depise the Govt. Post by: Fuzzyone on December 28, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: Re: I could write a book on why I de..., posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 28, 2005
You have me thinking now Kramer. Lets see a paralegal, I heard a jail house lawyer call himself that once. You see most inmates in jail that dream of being a lawyer are all self educated the same way. Title: Re: Re: Re: Re: I could write a book on why I depise the Govt. Post by: BenKramer1 on December 28, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: Re: Re: I could write a book on why ..., posted by Fuzzyone on Dec 28, 2005
Why would I want to be a lawyer when most people hate, despise, or at least distrusts most of them ? Besides I can bring arguments into the court that that members are of Bar Ass(es) cannot file or argue in court including some US Supreme Court decisions. This drives them insane ! Most if not all of the judges are legislating la from the bench Tom DeLay brought this up the press reports on it then suddenly he is indicted. Time to get your head out of your Fuzzy @ass Ben Title: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I could write a book on why I depise the Govt. Post by: Fuzzyone on December 28, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: Re: Re: Re: I could write a book on ..., posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 28, 2005
I think maybe you should get your head out of Tom Delay's @ss. Tom thought he could have it both ways, don't happen that way, you should know that right? Did they let you take all your books when you left the jail? Title: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I could write a book on why I depise the Govt. Post by: BenKramer1 on December 29, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I could write a book..., posted by Fuzzyone on Dec 28, 2005
They never kept me in jail much more than a few hours or a few days, but sure long enough to file some damn fine lawsuits. I have won one in the court of appeals and got some dismissed for various reasons but I have never been charged with anything more than a misdemeanor. Now who knows what they are talking about ? You or me ?? Ben PS. My RICO suit against the Chief Justice of the Ohio Supreme Court and others is yet to come ! They are the perfect example of an organized crime syndicate Title: Re: You wouldn't recognize the truth if it bit you in the ass Ben Post by: valuedcustomer on December 27, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to You wouldn't recognize the truth if it b..., posted by Ray on Dec 27, 2005
"I spent most of my adult life training to kill communists"
Neato! Title: Why do you? Post by: Joeylikey on December 27, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to You wouldn't recognize the truth if it b..., posted by Ray on Dec 27, 2005
I think a lot of us here would like to know that answer Ben. What your writing is Commie 101. Very basic crap. I to think there is another reason you hate this country. I know it's an old saying, but if you hate this country so much why are you living here??? Title: Re: Hey sHeat Head ! They dont lie at Congressional Hearings!!! Post by: Keith NC on December 26, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Hey sHeat Head ! They dont lie at Congre..., posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 26, 2005
I guess you are drinking the liberal koolaid again? You better stay away from that stuff. I hear it damages the brain. Title: Gullible Post by: doombug on December 26, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Hey sHeat Head ! They dont lie at Congre..., posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 26, 2005
[This message has been edited by doombug] Do you ever wonder why people judge what you post here as propaganda? Likely, it's because your links and "sources" SCREAM it! On that very site--www.iacenter.org--in the top margin, you find this: "Information, Activism, and Resistance to U.S. Militarism, War, and Corporate Greed, Linking with Struggles Against Racism and Oppression" The site is an outlet for radical anti-Americanism. Yet, you assume these independent, biased, nut-case sites carry more weight than long-established news departments. Activist sites have little reason to conduct oversite. Why? Because they know there's a following for this stuff; they know people such as yourself will assume anything they put forth to be true. International Action Center (www.iacenter.org) was supposedly founded by Ramsey Clark. Ramsey Clark!?!?!?! Here's a refresher course on Mr. Clark (courtesy of Wikipedia): "Following his term he worked as a law professor and was active in the anti–Vietnam War movement. He visited North Vietnam in 1972. In 1974 he was the Democratic Party's candidate for the United States Senate from New York, losing to Jacob Javits. "More recently, Clark has become controversial for his radical political views. He has also provided legal counsel and advice to controversial figures in conflict with Western governments, including: * Nazi concentration camp boss Karl Linnas * The National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws Advisory Board during late 1970s and early 1980s * Branch Davidian leader David Koresh * Antiwar activist Father Philip Berrigan * American Indian prisoner Leonard Peltier * Crimes of America conference in Tehran in 1980 * Liberian political figure Charles Taylor during his 1985 fight against extradition from the United States to Liberia * Elizaphan Ntakirutimana, a leader of the Rwandan genocide * PLO leaders in a lawsuit brought by the family of Leon Klinghoffer, the wheelchair bound elderly tourist who was shot and tossed overboard from the hijacked Achille Lauro cruise ship by Palestinian terrorists in 1986 * Camilo Mejia, a US soldier who deserted his post in March 2004 allegedly in protest against the US war against Iraq. * Radovan Karadzic, of Yugoslavia and accused war criminal * Counsel to Slobodan Milosevic, former president of Yugoslavia, accused war criminal * Saddam Hussein, former president of Iraq and accused war criminal "In December 2005, Clark went to Iraq to try to join the legal team defending Saddam Hussein before the Iraqi Special Tribunal, and now acts as an advisor to Hussein's legal team. Clark returned to Iraq in late November 2005 to assist and draw publicity for Hussein's defense and the anti-war movement and was admitted to join Saddam Hussein's defense team as adviser on November 27, 2005. "Clark is affiliated with VoteToImpeach, an organization advocating the impeachment of President George W. Bush. He has been an opponent of both Gulf Wars. He is the founder of the International Action Center, which has significant overlapping membership with the Workers World Party [Yes, dear reader, your instincts are correct: Workers World Party is one of America's very own communist parties]. Clark and the IAC helped found the protest organization ANSWER (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism)."
Are you that naive??? Title: The Nuclear Physicis and Dr. are Gullible too right ??? Post by: BenKramer1 on December 26, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Gullible, posted by doombug on Dec 26, 2005
http://www.iacenter.org/depleted/du7397.htm
Title: Re: The Nuclear Physicis and Dr. are Gullible too right ??? Post by: doombug on December 27, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to The Nuclear Physicis and Dr. are Gullibl..., posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 26, 2005
[This message has been edited by doombug] Follow this, now. First, from the IAC/Ramsey link you provided, closing paragraph: "In his testimony, Dr. Rotsker quoted from the book, 'Metal of Dishonor: How the Pentagon Radiates Soldiers and Civilians with Depleted Uranium Weapons.' The DU Education Project has documented DU exposures in this recently published book which is available by calling 1-800-247-6553 or by contacting the above address." A simple editorial book review of "Metal of Dishonor" from Amazon.com: "The drastic health and environmental consequences of a new generation of radioactive weapons, Depleted Uranium (DU), currently being used in U.S.-waged wars are discussed in these essays. This 'new kind of nuclear war' is examined alongside the effects on Vietnam and Gulf war veterans and the indigenous people on whose land these weapons are being tested. Among the issues covered are the collaborative military and media cover-up of DU, the government's denial of DU's toxic effects, uranium development on Native American land, nuclear testing on the Marshall Islands, and radioactive residue in the Middle East. Contributors include RAMSEY CLARK [my emphasis], Pat Broudy, and Helen Caldicott. Official government documents on DU and its effects and charts illustrating where DU is tested and stored in the United States are included for further examination." So, Clark contributed to the very book that the "doctor" deferred to during this hearing. Do you see ANY conflict of interest here? Anything come off as contrived? By the way, the publisher of "Metal of Dishonor"... (Are you ready?) The International Action Center. Furthermore, do a little follow-up on the "editors" of the book--Sara Flounders and John Catalinotto. They, too, are affiliated with, and frequent contributors too, the IAC's/DU Education Project's website. On the side, Catalinotto is a member of the (communist) Workers World Party. His profile: Not coincidently, Flounders is also a member of WWP, and a contributor to their newsletter--"Workers World". Her profile: http://www.discoverthenetwork.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1534 Newsletter samples: http://www.workers.org/2005/world/syria-1103/ Finally, check out the scant/poor reviews of the books these nuts have authored (actually, they appear only to co-author books) on Amazon.com. Many of these IAC "coordinators/co-coordinators" have co-authored a range of anti-American books--all published by the IAC. Here's a sampling: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-url/index=books&field-author-exact=Sara%20Flounders&rank=-relevance%2C%2Bavailability%2C-daterank/104-3487234-4583118 Credible people, you presume. Title: Try to debunk the message ! Post by: BenKramer1 on December 27, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: The Nuclear Physicis and Dr. are Gul..., posted by doombug on Dec 27, 2005
[This message has been edited by BenKramer1] You miss the point, the US Govt is using DU weapons that are lethal to our troops. Read this bill introduced to congress to study this problem. Try to attack the message and not the messengers OK ? http://www.thepowerhour.com/news2/du_HR2410.htm And while you are there check out some of these other links too. http://www.thepowerhour.com/du.htm Title: Re: Try to debunk the message ! Post by: Fuzzyone on December 28, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Try to debunk the message !, posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 27, 2005
I think it is more like attack the guy who believes everything he reads. Why don't you give us a break don't you know that it really is not that hard to get a bill intro to congress, but getting it approved is another story, won't happen. Title: those quirky messengers Post by: doombug on December 27, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Try to debunk the message !, posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 27, 2005
Most of the congressional findings in your link detail common-sensical stuff, such as: general descriptions about depleted uranium munitions, their dispribution, usage, and their obsolescence. Though, these two findings stood out: "(7) No definitive cause has been established for the various illnesses (commonly referred to as Gulf War Syndrome) that affect approximately 130,000 members and former members of the United States Armed Forces who served in Southwest Asia during the Persian Gulf War in 1991. Sandia National Laboratories report, July 2005: "An Analysis of Uranium Dispersal and Health Effects Using a Gulf War Case Study" "The study described in this report used mathematical modeling to estimate health risks from exposure to depleted uranium (DU) during the 1991 Gulf War for both U.S. troops and nearby Iraqi civilians. The analysis found that the risks of DU-induced leukemia or birth defects are far too small to result in an observable increase in these health effects among exposed veterans or Iraqi civilians. Only a few veterans in vehicles accidentally struck by U.S. DU munitions are predicted to have inhaled sufficient quantities of DU particulate to incur any significant health risk (i.e., the possibility of temporary kidney damage from the chemical toxicity of uranium and about a 1% chance of fatal lung cancer). The health risk to all downwind civilians is predicted to be extremely small." http://www.sandia.gov/news-center/news-releases/2005/def-nonprolif-sec/snl-dusand.pdf "According to a European Union study released in 2001, 'most of the ingested DU (between 98% and 99.8%, depending on the solubility of the uranium compound) will be rapidly eliminated in the faeces.' The vast majority of any remaining uranium will be "rapidly cleared from the blood" in a few weeks. Similarly, the majority of inhaled DU dust will also be cleared via the bloodstream and kidneys. The EU report concluded that 'exposure to DU could not produce any detectable health effects under realistic assumptions of the doses that would be received.'" http://www.skepticism.net/articles/2003/000025.html My whole point is, there's a huge difference between healthy skepticism and "life's calling." It appears that you are relying on a lot of activist/anti-American organizations to support this view that the U.S. government is purely diabolical. On a personal note, I served as an infantryman with the 1st Marine Division during Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm, and never contracted anything resembling Gulf War Syndrome. I took the anti-malarial and anti-nerve agent tabs for a three-month period, patrolled through the oil fields that were set ablaze by Sadam's forces, and snooped around and collected a souvenir or two around the tanks and in the trench lines/bunkers that were leveled by our forces. I soaked this up for three months, and no GWS (but I certainly could have feigned it and filed a claim). I wonder, what percentage of GWS claims do you think are bogus? There's even a revised name for it floating around: Gulf Lore Syndrome: http://reason.com/9703/fe.fumento.shtml But as relates to the issue of DU, I think this is among the fairest, most level-headed, and unbiased takes you'll find: "The Science of the Silver Bullet" A bio of the writer and a synopsis of his article: http://nasw.org/mem-maint/awards/01Franzenbio.html Finally, I couldn't help but notice this front page "Press Release" headline on the site you linked to (www.thepowerhour.com): "HIGH RANKING MILITARY OFFICERS AND AIRLINE PILOTS AGREE THAT THE SOUTH TOWER WAS NOT HIT BY FLIGHT 175!" The internet version of tabloid journalism. Title: Ramsey Clark..Saddam s lawyer? up THE MEDS!! Post by: Heat on December 26, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Hey sHeat Head ! They dont lie at Congre..., posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 26, 2005
Wow...you really got a good one there. Ramsey Clark has Saddam Hussein has him for a lawyer. UP THE MEDS!!!!! Title: Re: Hey sHeat Head ! They dont lie at Congressional Hearings!!! Post by: BenKramer1 on December 26, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Hey sHeat Head ! They dont lie at Congre..., posted by BenKramer1 on Dec 26, 2005
http://www.traprockpeace.org/bunker_busters_kilpatrick.html
Title: Re: Up your medication and pull down the foil hat! Post by: Dan Las Vegas on December 26, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Up your medication and pull down the foi..., posted by Heat on Dec 26, 2005
Make sure he uses environmentally safe foil, name brand foil contains deadly radiation and is a secret plot by George bush to silence his critics....lol Title: Re: Re: Up your medication and pull down the foil hat! Post by: Joeylikey on December 26, 2005, 05:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: Up your medication and pull down the..., posted by Dan Las Vegas on Dec 26, 2005
Didn't they find foil in the levy system in New Orleans. I hear George Bush put it there so the levy system would collaspe. This was due to Racial Profiling by our government. Learn something new everyday. |