... in response to Celt you were right, posted by Hiker on Apr 28, 2003My perspective on the issue whether they are doing a
good job or not in the Bogota embassy is this: their
actions seem to indicate that they are operating at
about 90-95% efficiency. I am in the software business.
We have an expression for this: "Good enough for govt.
work." If [this kind of] software code got into the field,
I would be out of a job. If someone preparing taxes for
clients had this kind of efficiency, so would he. It is
difficult to think of a professional--or someone starting
out at a McDonald's-- who could keep their job,
while operating at this level. I just don't see why we should
accept it from the embassy, or any other outpost of govt.
Most gentleman who follow these posts, and plan on a trip
to the embassy, will never experience inconvenience. The
comments that these experiences are rare, and worthy of patience
and understanding, are valid. But, those stuck at the margins,
like Hiker, will see the difference between 100% and 90%.
They shouldn't have to.
In a competitive market environment, or one where "posmo" and
negative motivation are in effect, their business practices
would change in a matter of days. Since none of these conditions
exist, I think I should let my Congressman know how women travel
across a dangerous country, just to be told, "We'll call you."
Even if it is only 5-10% of the time.