Larry

[Matthew]

That is three times you have chosen to respond to me by attacking my wife.Normally, on here I have urged people to post their views and not to consider disagreements "attacks" but in this case you are not disagreeing with me just attacking my spouse.That is pretty cowardly to do behind a computer.

My wife wanted to know what I was doing on the computer so she cam up behind me and read one of your posts.Then she read them all.She was a little confused how she was the target yet I was the poster.I didn't have any good explanation except to say since you had no real rebuttal you just chose her.Whats her take on all this.Well, I'll quote here."He is just a generalizer.He doesn't even know me.Don't waste time with this stuffs.I pity him.He is just hurt."There you have it.So, on a suggestion from the Boss, I will take the high road.I will not post on this subject(Larry's "I Shall Return" visit from two years ago)anymore.Even if you bring it up.I am outta here now to buy flowers and cards for my lovely Mrs.Your posts got me thinking.This whole MOB thing is a bit of a crapshoot and I could have turned out like you.Bitter,distrustful and drunk.Actually, I have already been there and back so I guess I should understand more than most and pity you.Just like my wife does:)

Have a great life.

tito Matt

[shadow]

... in response to Larry, posted by Matthew on Dec 7, 2002

Well, it looks as though you are finally willing to be mature and sensible, so I will make a galant effort to make you understand.

#1. You attacked me first. You obviously didn't like something I posted, and responded in a childish manner. That is laughable. You cannot piss me off, for I am way beyond that. All you did was give me a great number of laughs. The more I piss you off, the more I will laugh at you. The more I laugh at you, the more I will piss you off.

#2.  You are the one that brought your wife into this thread. You chose her, not I. "I got what you are chasing"  Trying to rub some salt into the wounds?  Well, it didn't work. If your wife is indeed one of the good ones, I appologize to her, and I pity her for hooking up with someone so immature.

#3.  Distrustful, yes. Bitter and/or drunk, no. I am quite happy and content with life and where my life is going at present, which is a large part of what made your misguided attacks so pitifully humorous to me. I haven't had a drink since my return from the PI two weeks ago, so I guess that leaves out the drunk part too.

So in reality your misguided misconceptional attacks were the cause of your distress. They certainly caused me no distress.  

Have a nice day.  

Larry.

P.S. I really do pity your wife.

[Humabdos]

... in response to Larry, posted by Matthew on Dec 7, 2002

I have met Larry several times. He's a good person I read all the posts and it looks to me like you are the one who attacked him first along with Ray S. What he said is not that far off from the truth. I don't mean what he said about your wife. When you attack someone expect to be attacted in return. Hum

[Matthew]

... in response to Matt, posted by Humabdos on Dec 7, 2002

Come on,Hum.I think you know my chatboard persona by now.Bring it on I say.I am ready to rumble and nuke rather than just flame:)Keeps things interesting.But,he just has nothing to rebutt so he attacks Joy.That is not right.No class or just no rebuttal.Which is it do you think?(Thats OK.You dont have to answer)

tito Matt

BTW-this is not a response to Larry.I am still on the high road.Hehe.

[Humabdos]

... in response to Re: Matt, posted by Matthew on Dec 7, 2002

I have said much worse so who am I to judge? lol Just relax don't get high blood as the filipinas would say! HUM