... in response to Re: Re: Re: Re: weak dollar has its char..., posted by stefang on May 20, 2003If the definition of corporate greed is a desire to generate as much profit as possible and maximize return on investment, then you are correct. Corporations are greedy. Let be honest, however, about who is greedy here. Its not just the Jack Welch's of the world who are greedy. Its every stockholder and every mutual fund owner who is just as greedy. Anyone who gets upset when their 401K shrinks instead of grow is just as guilty as the big, bad corporate CEOs. The "greedy" wall street investor is the one who creates and environment for corporate officers to do everything they do. In short, you, me and every other investor are the source of the behavior you dislike so much.
Business is about profit. Yes its wonderful to talk about fair wages and to characterize unskilled labor as some sort of Gary Cooper type quiet hero, but that does not mean its economically viable in the 21st century to pay someone even low scale US wages for assembly and more simple manufacturing jobs.
These corporations can make it somewhere else with cheaper labor and still save a very big bundle when the tack on shipping costs. The company makes more money. The stock price goes up. Shareholders are happy and the corporate officers are then rewarded by grateful shareholders.
It makes a lot more sense to be pragmatic and talk about how we can actually help people in need than to talk about pie in the sky changes that are never going to happen anyway. Like lowering the value of the dollar or forcing companies to keep jobs in this country. Yes retraining for more viable jobs is a great starting point, but we also have to stop the bleeding. Our society produces way to many unfocused and ignorant people for its own good. If Playstation was a viable job skill, then we would have absolutely no worries. Unfortunately the day when playstation will put us over the top has not come yet. Bottom line is that we need to educate our young people better and channel them into more productive job fields. It needs to be a strategic deeicison made at the federal level or it just won't work.
As for the national healthcare idea, I agree with you to a point. I would love to see everyone get good, reliable healthcare. No one with a heart could say anything else. Unfortunately, someone would have to pay for the tremendous outlay of cash that would be needed. Who do you think will pay it? Most likely it will be a government mandated burden imposed on employers. Yes you heard it right. Universal health coverage will most likely be paid for by business via a government mandate. Unfortunately, this will only speed up the flight of manufacturing and assembly job to other countries because it will increase the employee cost here.
I don't really see a global meltdown of the economy, but who knows. Could you tell us a little more about the reasons for your statement regarding a global crash?