Planet-Love.com Searchable Archives
November 24, 2024, 08:30:42 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: This board is a BROWSE and SEARCH only board. Please IGNORE the Registration - no registration necessary. No new posts allowed. It contains the archived posts from the Planet-Love.com website from approximately 2001 through 2005.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Other Board Challenge  (Read 13812 times)
Jack
Guest
« Reply #30 on: May 01, 2003, 04:00:00 AM »

... in response to What a SHAMEFUL Waste of Energy . . ., posted by Dan on May 1, 2003

Patrick,

I hope you will reinforce your previous warning given to myself and xxxxxxxxxxx. I have not replied to or mentioned dickhead by name (ooppps, guess I just did). He has continued too, and has on many occassions, violated your warning. This is what you told the board and I on January 17th,.....

************************************************************

Jack and MarkInTx warning
Post a followup Return to Forum Forum FAQ Edit Message
Posted by Patrick on 01/17/2003

The next one of you to reply to the other, or mention the other in any post will be banned for a week.


************************************************************

Patrick I am sure I am speaking for many, certainly for myself, when I ask you to please keep this warning and condition in effect. As you can probably tell his only contributions to our board is one of dissention.

I am sure you have noticed how peaceful and polite the board has become Patrick when a certain instigator does not give us his daily dose of wisdom that changes weekly.

Talk about newby's being confused, not wanting to post! I am sure many newby's do not know what to think when they see an individual who is Planet Love's second all time leading poster one day advise the board, and I quote " Believe in true love -- be careful of who you marry -- love her like it's never going to end AND GET A PRENUP SIGNED!!!!". He strongly advises everyone to get a pre-nuptial, except when it comes to him! Or how one week this individual advises that a person must write many, visit many to be successful and then after writing one, visiting one and marrying one, now this is without doubt the most successful way of doing things. How he threatens that once after his bride get's to America he will never post anymore in hopes people will beg him to stay (and no one does) and than does quite the opposite by posting even more, which wouldn't be so bad except for the constant flip-flop of advice and opinions and mis-stating of facts and statistics which do not exist in his hopes of proving his method the best way. How he advises newby's that, and I quote " I know there has been much discussion on whether you should expect sex when going to visit your FSU girlfriend. I would say that A) a true gentleman never expects sex – no matter what continent he is on" and then loads up on viagra himself, wonder why!!!! And as far as how long a guy should wait until getting married during the 90 day K-1 period, and again I quote on 12-05-01 " In other words... use the three months to really decide if you BOTH will be happy here, together" and on 11-23-01 "Three months isn't very long, as you said Tootsie. And yet, many people don't even bother using the three months they are given." And then marries with-in the first 10 days himself!!! Come on, when can anyone take this guys advice when he does not even practice what he preaches? Can you say 'clueless'?

One of the few things boy blunder has ever said that makes any sense was on 10-18-02 when he said the following " I mention these because it has made me face one fact I would rather ignore: The Internet is a good source for information... but it is an equally good source for mis-information." Yes, I think we can all agree with that. And look at the source of the greatest mis-information.

Logged
Jack
Guest
« Reply #31 on: April 30, 2003, 04:00:00 AM »

... in response to SRG, good one., posted by Mr Robert on Apr 30, 2003

Mr. Robert, I can assure you that the post's I made on the SRG board detailing scams we had encountered were not removed by me!

Scams reported by agencies who are not advertisors remain, they are no problem. Just scams that are reported by the advertisors, and I will only speak in my case here, no one else's, but the scams I reported which were committed by the monthly paying advertisors of the SRG were, for some reason, deleted.

In Patrick's case I think he runs his boards with the thought of his boards being helpful, to offer good advice and to warn others, especially newby's, about suspect and scam agencies.

To shield from public view, to purposely not disclose scams or allow for the discussion of scam activites by certain agencies because of a vested interest is just wrong.

Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!