... in response to Re: Gee... when the Marx brothers show u..., posted by wsbill on Oct 13, 2002That I make a completely straight-forward response to a poster's questions - and suddenly, because I didn't stop to consider that I might make hurt poor little Marky-Mark's feelings, I am accused of "cheap shots" and the like.
After I thought about it more - it began to rankle me just a bit. Now, on this board, we are apparently supposed to tip-toe around littly Marky-Mark's feelings - lest we say something that [Heaven forbid!] Marky-Mark might find offensive!!
Never mind the fact that he has admitted being at the center of many of the most senseless debates.
Never mind the fact that he is the one intentionally misrepresenting the posts/messages of MANY on this board - all to continue to stir up crap - AND he consistently devolves a debate into an attack on personal character.
Never mind that fact that he made the conscious choice (at least, I *presume* it was conscious --smile--) to post details of his relationship that some - maybe many - feel warrants a response. If not for his sake - for the sake of others that might be misled by his effusive and lovelorn nature.
And - in my particular case - never mind that fact that I didn't associate my response with Marky-Mark's history. I don't hang on every word that Marky-Mark writes - and as he is one of the more prolific contributors (and I use the term VERY loosely) to this board, that is a good thing.
In case it isn't obvious - I do not intend to 'dance around' Marky-Mark and his ultra-sensitivities. I won't fall prey to the pressures to be ultra-cautious with my posts should they fall within the broad boundaries of Marky-Mark's 'pain' zone.
As for the other Mark (MarkH), he and Jack are clearly at odds. I wish it were not so. I suppose as a paid-up member of "Bragg's Brigade" (according to Marky-Mark), I really should be supporting Jack's side of the argument - and while I *do* see merit to Jack's side - I also see MarkH's perspective. I've attributed it to one of those issues in which reasonable people (and unreasonable ones too --smile--) can, and will, disagree.
So - FWIW - in summary, I too wish the board would become a venue in which there is less sniping and fewer 'wars' being waged. It grows wearisome for all concerned - and I suspect it puts off more than a few initial visitors. I will do my part - provided others do theirs.
- Dan