... in response to MOST dangerous US cities, posted by Pete E on Nov 22, 2005[This message has been edited by Bueller]
I'm in Philadelphia right now, and this was on the front page yesterday because Camden is right across the river. I kind of wondered about this, because the article I read online didn't give ANY details about how these ratings were formulated. I don't know how it's supposed to reflect on the majority of us who just mind our own business and stay out of trouble. Maybe there's a lot of drug/gang activity that skews the numbers but doesn't usually affect normal people? I was in St. Louis for over a week this month, left a pimp-daddy rock star bus out on the street every night with the luggage doors unlocked and it was never broken into; walked around at all hours downtown with no problems. Lived near Detroit for a while, worked downtown for part of that time and never even felt threatened there. Spent time in Richmond on another tour last summer with no problem, even hauling a suitcase through downtown at midnight...spend a lot of time around Atlanta...does the New Orleans rating reflect Katrina? I was there for six weeks in the aftermath, jogged around several times downtown late at night and even up Tulane Avenue, which in normal times is a death wish. Only danger was stepping on broken glass or getting in trouble for breaking curfew. Meanwhile in my safe, pristine Seattle a Boeing engineer gets shot in the head at a stoplight on his way to work because someone wanted his new Mustang.
So in Colombia, how does that affect a Gringo who just goes and doesn't step on anyone's tail, doesn't try to hit on a narcotraficante's girlfriend, etc.?