ACG new member fees

[locoabogado]

I guess the newest revenue source for ACG is to charge a fee of $10 to be a member if you want to read the profiles. Before you could in addition to seeing additional pictures of the girls but not anymore. I guess if you are real interested and serious about going then $10 isnt a big deal but it does turn one off as compared to calivip who doesnt charge for that and from a marketing perspective, it makes calivip more likely to get my business. Perhaps ACG is going for the lookie lou's and make some extra dinero. I actually like Jamie's site and would probably prefer baq based on the bad press I seem to read here all the time about cali except its impossible for me to get there from socal without flying all night and sitting in an airport half a day, lucky for you east coasters.....I still havent figured out where to go next, except back to spanish classes to get better at that before my next trip.....

[fathertime]

... in response to ACG new member fees, posted by locoabogado on Aug 15, 2005

ACG and the new format made it hard for me to know enough about the gals to use their services in my upcoming Sept. trip.  10 dollars is a drop in the bucket but it rubbed me the wrong way so now I am spending double to stay at Cali-Vip where I can at least see and know a bit about the girls in advance (Even if they are shills!)
Actually I probably would have stayed at Cali vip anyway just to see what they are about and see if I am looking at a bunch of shills or the real thing.  
Fathertime

[Calipro]

... in response to Re: ACG new member fees, posted by fathertime on Aug 15, 2005

If you are going to stay at an agency you might as well cut your balls off and take a full page ad in "El Pais" to tell everybody in Cali who you are going out with and what you are doing. hehehe!!!

[fathertime]

... in response to rank amateurs, posted by Calipro on Aug 15, 2005

Man I must be slow.  I wish I understood what you are telling me.  I will be at Vip in 2 weeks and am prepared to make an ass out of myself if that helps!
Fathertime

[Calipro]

... in response to Re: rank amateurs, posted by fathertime on Aug 15, 2005

Well let me spell it out.

One major draw back to staying at most agencies is that they don't let you take women to your room. I hear Mike runs things a little different and women can go to your room if they want. But I have to tell you that staying over night at an agency is probably the last place a girl would want to stay.

Every thing you say and do will be common knowledge. The secretaries are friends with the women in the agencies. That is how they get them to show up for appointments with guys that they have never seen.

If the secretaries ask you what you think of some girl be vague because it will get back to her. If you are dating more than one girl they will know.

I suggest that you stay at the Raddison Hotel. It's five minutes from CaliVip. Get out and see every agency and really see what Cali has to offer.

[fathertime]

... in response to Re: Re: rank amateurs, posted by Calipro on Aug 15, 2005

Calipro, Thanks for spelling it out for me.  Lots of good info. for me although ACG did not seem to care about the sleepover thing.  The girls left on there own at a late hour.  Sleeping over does not matter too much really since I will have just met them but I am a guy so I rarely ever turn it down.  I must have known intuitively not to give details to the secretary so I will not worry much about that.   All in all I think an agency is still a pretty good choice for me at this point.  After this, (My second trip) I will consider the hotel route.   I am confident that I will meet someone I want to investigate further.  
Thank you for sharing your knowledge.
Fathertime

[Malandro]

... in response to Re: ACG new member fees, posted by fathertime on Aug 15, 2005

on another forum.  the feature lasted just one week as the selection of at least marginally attractive women was exhausted.  (the one week duration included reruns)

he is now posting "Babes of the Aleutian Islands with Seals" that has been running nearly two weeks now.  

[Pete E]

... in response to someone was posting "Calivip Girl o..., posted by Malandro on Aug 15, 2005

It went over the top when guys who were pissed at the guy started picking the women apart,one being an ex of a friend of mine.He didn't appreciate it.

Pete

[Malandro]

... in response to Re: someone was posting "Calivip Gi..., posted by Pete E on Aug 16, 2005

I do not advocate what he was doing.

[Bueller]

... in response to someone was posting "Calivip Girl o..., posted by Malandro on Aug 15, 2005

I visited that site not long ago, I think because it was mentioned here. After a bit of browsing I found myself thinking, "Is it just me, or are these women not exactly knockouts?" Still, posting their pictures for ridicule is over the top in meanness. Anyone who posts pictures like that, or adds peanut-gallery comments, ought to post his own picture for critique as well; chances are, if they are such studs themselves they would find all the 10s they so obviously deserve right here in the U.S.

[Malandro]

... in response to Re: someone was posting "Calivip Gi..., posted by Bueller on Aug 16, 2005

they were posted by a seemingly overzealous fan of those particular women from that site.  one could even suspect that the poster has some particular financial interest in the site but that would be mere speculation.

what do you got against Aleutian  Islands' women anyway?

the problem being, as you noted, the women are not exactly stellar beauties and comments by other posters were accurate observations.  

[Ray]

... in response to the pictures were not posted for ridicul..., posted by Malandro on Aug 16, 2005

"seemingly overzealous fan”? ROFL! You mean shameless agency shill, right?

I don’t know why anyone would want to do business with lying spammers. They plant shills on the forum, harvest e-mail addresses from the private member’s area for their spam list, and then don’t even have the guts to admit it and apologize to the forum.

SCREW SPAMMERS!!!

[Malandro]

... in response to CaliVIP Sucks!, posted by Ray on Aug 16, 2005

n/t

[mudd]

... in response to someone was posting "Calivip Girl o..., posted by Malandro on Aug 15, 2005

that could be true, but at least they dont have as many gold diggers as ACG.

[CelticUrge]

... in response to someone was posting "Calivip Girl o..., posted by Malandro on Aug 15, 2005

Mal:

Where are they posting "Babes of the Aleutian Islands with Seals"

I haven't seen that one.