OK,we have gotten pretty good at rating women,but what about us?
I was thinking of a few factors that should be included to come up with a number.Rating should be done by another person,prefferably a woman who is not anamored or p***ed at youor obsesed wit your money.Of course women who are enamored will rate you high.We might say thats all that counts,but it would be a scewed number.
OK,take 10,the max,and multiply it by:
General Appearance.1 to 10,does not include personality or dynamic issues.
Physical desirabilty. 32/ waist size squared
Dynamic Sex appeal.1 to 1.I know guys with low appearance but lots of this.
Personal Dork factor.This is a dynamic quality. 10 -PDF/10
PDF is rated 1-10 Kind of the opposite of Sex appeal
Whinny ass factor 10-WAF/10 WAF is rated 1-10
Pain in the butt factor. 10-PB/10 PB rated 1-10
So,as an EXAMPLE ONLY,a guy might be 10 x .3 X 32/48 squared x 1 x 10-8/10 x 10-9/10 x 10-8/10
This would simplyfy to 10 x .3 x 32/2304 x .2 x .2 x .1 x .2
that would be .0024 without the waist size,which would be another factor of .0014 or .00000336.
Did I get the decimals right? Oh hell ,lets just say 0.
As you can see this goes beyond pure appearance.
If we take out the non appearance factors the example above would yeild:
10 x .3 x .0014(that waist size is a killer) or .000126 ?? still about 0.OK,lets not square the actual waist size.So 32/48 = .67
or an overall rating of 2.01 Thats more like it.
Might be a little too tough.And with women the agreement we had with my buddies when we worked out our 10 scale for women was we would not bother to argue about negative numbers.
Now,enough cash will get you the TEMPORARY APPEARANCE of a higher rating.That will go away when you run out of money or she has enough of yours she doesn't want to put up with you any more.Or she decides
IT JUST AIN'T f***ING WORTH IT.The non appearance factors can play a big role here,particularly WAF and PB.
Pete