Will S.E. Asia be spared from UN's Feminist Agenda???

[Henry]

The UN is planning on expanding its international feminist agenda. Basically they want to turn women world wide into ****s just like our precious AW.

Begin article:


Obama Pushing for New Radical Feminist Agency at United Nations

Contact: Colin Mason, Population Research Institute, 540-622-5240 ext 209

FRONT ROYAL, Va., March 3 /Christian Newswire/ -- The Obama administration has endorsed a proposal to create a new U.N. bureaucracy dedicated to restructuring relations between the sexes along radical feminist lines. The new super-agency is supported by a consortium of feminist organizations called the Gender Equality Architecture Reform Campaign (GEAR).

The surprise move came late yesterday at the meeting of the U.N. Commission on the Status of Women, currently underway in New York. Both the Obama administration and the European Union immediately seconded the proposal to create a new U.N. super-agency, which thus appears to have a good chance of passage.

Radical feminists have long been discontented with the alphabet soup of relatively low-level offices and commissions that exist in the U.N. to advance their agenda. The new agency would amalgamate four existing entities--the Office of the Special Adviser on Gender Issues and Advancement of Women, the Division for the Advancement of Women, the United Nations Development Fund for Women and the United Nations International Research and Training Institute for the Advancement of Women--into one super-agency. The Division for the Advancement of Women, in particular, has a universal UN mandate that would then be at the service of the new bureaucracy. To give the organization even more clout, an Under-Secretary-General, who would report directly to the U.N. Secretary-General, would head it.

The draft proposal urges that the agency be set up before the end of the current session of the General Assembly, and that it be dedicated to "gender equality" and the "empowerment of women." In the past, such code words have been used to justify such actions as admonishing Belarus for celebrating Mother's Day because this "reinforced traditional stereotypes of women." Even liberal Denmark has been chastised for having too few female generals in the ranks of its military. The supporters of the new U.N. agency revealingly refer to it as "Gender Architecture," or GEAR.

Radical feminists believe that such a super-agency would give them access to both the money and power they need to advance their agenda. "We need money, we need a billion dollars for this to be effective on the ground level," says Charlotte Bunch, the representative of GEAR. Bunch went on to note that this first billion would just be "catalytic," only what would be needed to get the organization off the ground.

"The pro-life pro-family movement should absolutely oppose the creation of a UN super-agency dedicated to radical feminist goals, which undermine marriage, weaken the family, and thus endanger children both born and unborn," says Steven Mosher, President of the Population Research Institute. "What is being proposed is a very powerful agency with a global mandate to restructure relations between the sexes. If the past is any indicator, it will be used to impose the lifestyle of Manhattan and Hollywood feminists on family-centered countries and cultures. It is cultural imperialism at its worst."

http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/8926413209.html

All that will be needed after that will be for the elites to crash the respective currencies, then "loan" the countries money to prop them back up, with the caveat that they adopt the US style feminist agenda in schools, which will radically change the world.

[z_k_g]

Thanks for the update.

Just some thoughts:

The UN is the most ineffective organization ever conceived and in operation.  This new level of bureaucracy will be just that, a new division of an already brain dead operation.  I mean look at the security council, what a joke.  No permanent representation from Africa?  Very little permanent representation from South America and Asia (China excluded).  We may not understand the politics of power, raw materials and greed, but the rest of the world does and the UN and the World Bank represent the power brokers.  

The reality is that women throughout the world are happy with their lives, they are just not happy with poverty.  All the "feminist" missionary work will fall on deaf ears, women, like men in the 3rd world are sick of the political talk, they just "want to see the money"

I'm really not concerned with this new UN agency effecting the women of Asia or SA in any significant way this generation or even in the next 100 years.  A bureaucracy will change nothing, a movement of wealth on the other hand.....will change everything.

Unwittingly if our economy and bad fiscal policy continue, the 3rd world will become the 1st world.  If our economy continues south and our population continues to be undereducated, overweight, watch tv and play play station all day then the UN will, ironically, have to spend time here in the USA helping us.

Just one man's opinion.

Zulu

[jm21-2]

TV will do a lot more.

[Shadow_mas]

What would exactly be the problem with that ? Afraid of women already?

[Henry]

What would exactly be the problem with that ? Afraid of women already?

Why arent you married to a woman from your home country?

[robert angel]

Geeze Henry,

I woke up to your post and thought 'Nah--it can't be--Enry's computer's infected or something, maybe someone spiked his Cheerios again...--bogus information. But slap me silly---they're trying to pull this one off! As seen below. I caught a July 6. 2010 link from Newsweek that's interesting:

 
The newsweek piece is a lengthily article and as we know, I never make long posts here, so there's a link below (Don't you love that popular new term 'Mancession'?) and this is a little 'snippet' from it:

Note that they've been 'gearing' up this Feminist--UN activity in South East Asia going back to at least 2008.

I looked at some economic figures and in the USA for sure, as well as most of the world in general, women have control of most of the world's money, same as it's always been. I guess that's not enough!

Perhaps we'll all be made to donate sperm if deemed 'worthy,' to allow procreation and then neutered according to law!

http://www.newsweek.com/2010/07/06/women-will-rule-the-world.html


When historians write about the great recession of 2007–08, they may very well have a new name for it: the Mancession. It’s a term already being bandied about in the popular media as business writers chronicle the sad tales of the main victims of the recession: men. They were disproportionately represented in the industries hit hardest during the downturn, including financial services, manufacturing, and construction, and their higher salaries often put them first in the line of fire. Men are the victims of two thirds of the 11 million jobs lost since the recession began in 2007; in August 2009, when U.S. male unemployment stood at 11 percent (versus 8.3 for women), it was the largest unemployment gender gap in the postwar era. Those numbers have improved, a bit—new unemployment figures show men at 9.9 percent and women at 7.8—but not enough to stop Larry Summers, the president’s top economic adviser, from speculating recently, that “when the economy recovers, five years from now, one in six men who are 25 to 54 will not be working.”

 Robert Nickelsberg / Getty Images
Click to view a gallery of secure jobs for the next decade.
If they are lucky, they’ll have wives who can take care of them. American women are already the breadwinners or co-breadwinners in two thirds of American households; in the European Union, women filled 75 percent of the 8 million new jobs created since 2000





 NEW: Global GEAR Campaign Website is Launched!  http://www.gearcampaign.org/index.php




Become a Fan of GEAR on Facebook

 

For the past three decades, women have seen the United Nations as a galvanizing force for our efforts to define a comprehensive global agenda for peace and security, human rights, gender equality, women's empowerment, poverty eradication and sustainable development. The UN reform process is important to women because we need the organizational structures, high level leadership and necessary resources to enable governments and the UN system to increase significantly their efforts to fulfill their promises on women's human rights, gender equality and women's empowerment.
HARED LINKSActions Details of New Gender Entity Proposed
Submitted by Margot on Thursday, February 11 2010

Actions EU Faults U.N. for Slowdown in Gender Empowerment by Thalif Deen
Submitted by Margot on Friday, February 05 2010

Actions December 22, 2010: Comprehensive proposal for the composite gender equality entity Repo...
Submitted by Margot on Tuesday, January 26 2010

Actions Make the United Nations more effective in realizing women’s rights
Submitted by Margot on Thursday, December 10 2009

Actions The UN Women's Superagency: This could be the start of something big!
Submitted by Margot on Thursday, December 10 2009
+ Add Link « prev | next » FEATURED DISCUSSIONAnalysis of the DSG paper on gender entity options
Last post by Margot on Monday, August 18 2008

Sign on letter or Send Letter to President of the GA
Last post by virada on Wednesday, August 27 2008

Latin America GEAR Update
Last post by Margot on Tuesday, October 21 2008

Southeast Asia GEAR Update
Last post by Margot on Wednesday, October 15 2008

GEAR Update: December 2008
Last post by Margot on Friday, December 05 2008
« prev | next »

[Henry]

I do wonder if there were 11 million illegal squaters in the USA who were driving down the wages of fields of upper middle class women, whether or not the Reps and Dems would be rallying to support them like they are when they take construction jobs and push down the wages for construction jobs. When Arnold Schwarzenegger in California went up against the teachers and nurses unions, he had false accusations of sexual assault made against him.

[Shadow_mas]

Why arent you married to a woman from your home country?

Because I did not meet one I wanted to be married to. 

[Henry]

Because I did not meet one I wanted to be married to. 

Highly evasive, but OK then.

[Bob_S]

When historians write about the great recession of 2007– 08 13,

FIFY.