In another thread, there was a debate about whether or not the West should lift a hand to contain the spread (and, contrary to how our
dhimmis feel about this, The Religion of Peaceâ„¢
wants to spread) of Islamofascism.
"We're at war with Islamic fascism...These people are after us not because we've oppressed them, not because of the state of Israel...It's because we stand for everything they hate."--Rick Santorum We occasionally ponder what would have happened had the Nazis succeeded in WWII and gone on to occupy all of Europe. And we frequently catch glimpses of what future America will look like once it's
permitted to be ruled by the peace-loving mullahs.
It's ugly as sin.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8f99/b8f998960efc05cb5fc55921923ac3fbef6377c1" alt=""
And it's titled, "Muslim sues judge who barred veil."
Woman claims her religious rights were violated when asked to remove head scarf.
Paul Egan / The Detroit News
A Muslim woman who was told she had to remove her veil if she wanted to testify in 31st District Court in Hamtramck filed a federal lawsuit Wednesday against the judge who made the ruling.
Ginnah Muhammad filed the complaint against Judge Paul Paruk, alleging he violated her religious rights and denied her equal access to the courts.
Muhammad had gone to small claims court last October in a dispute with a car rental company when Paruk said she could not testify unless she removed her veil, the lawsuit alleges.
"If in fact, you do not wish to do it, then I cannot go forward with your case and I have to dismiss your case," Paruk told the woman, according to a transcript attached to the complaint filed by Dearborn Heights lawyer Nabih Ayad.
Muhammad refused and Paruk dismissed the case, the lawsuit alleges.
Paruk did not return a phone call.
"I'm a human being and I wanted to come to court to get justice," Muhammad said at a news conference Wednesday outside the federal courthouse in Detroit.
"When I walked out, I just really felt empty, like the courts didn't care about me."
The Quran doesn't explicitly require women to cover their face, but many Muslim women wear a hajib or other covering as a sign of piety and modesty.
Muhammad said if Paruk does not understand religious rights he should be removed from the bench.
Her litigation with Enterprise Rent-A-Car continues, because the car rental company later brought a complaint against Muhammad for alleged damage to a car she rented.
A hearing in that case is set for April 18. Ayad said he wants U.S. District Judge John Feikens to order a stay in the case. Also, Ayad said he will bring a motion in 31st District Court asking Paruk to recuse himself from hearing it.
http://www.detroitnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070329/LIFESTYLE04/703290384About two weeks ago, I was fortunate enough to witness Muslim oppression firsthand. (I've since cc'd this account to
Savage, where, coincidently, I found the article above.) Real Muslim oppression; the type that's not mentioned in the article above, but that is
clearly visible to anyone with a sharp, objective eye. In my line of work, I'm often required to verify the identity of people who come before me. So, I receive this man and woman, both dressed head to toe in the familiar garb of observant Muslims. The woman was completely devoid of emotion; didn't say a word. The husband (aka, her "master"), on the other hand, was a bitter paranoid who refused to permit me to verify his wife's ID. "Only a woman could do that!" And, "It's against my religion!"
She wore a hijab, by the way, very similar to the one below:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cba73/cba735c743445e1ced73da65db95fbd5debc2038" alt=""
Again, even though I could
clearly see her face before me,
he resisted, and
he demanded to have a female made available to verify her photo ID.
Does he get away with this with the police, too?
Isn't this demanding special treatment?
How is this demeanor one of...
peace?
So, to the pro-IMBRA feminists who frequently conduct "research" here, and to the members of the more
liberal persuasion here who occasionally rant against their own country, I ask you: Who among you will be the first oppressed should the Grand Mullah come a knockin'? In what way does America currently oppress you? Would you even recognize oppression if it stood before you?
As I was recently fortunate to be reminded of.
Peace out, dawgs!